Thursday, July 4FROM THE RIVER TO THE SEA, PALESTINE WILL BE FREE

IMMIGRATION

New guidance on private life and family relationships
IMMIGRATION

New guidance on private life and family relationships

We mentioned on the podcast last month that revised Immigration Rules on private life — getting permission to stay in the UK based on various forms of long residence, essentially — would need fleshed out in policy guidance. That guidance has duly emerged, to coincide with Appendix Private Life coming into force on 20 June: see Private life: caseworker guidance. This topic used to be covered in the 101-page document covering both family life and private life; that has been reduced to a mere 91 pages and now just covers family life (including exceptional circumstances). Also out this week is brand new policy guidance on Relationship with a partner. This relates to Appendix Relationship with Partner, which was introduced recently to defi...
Humanitarian protection is being downgraded from 28 June 2022
Human Rights, IMMIGRATION, United Kingdom

Humanitarian protection is being downgraded from 28 June 2022

Page contents Background to the changesThe new humanitarian protection rules in more detailWhat will be the impact of the changes?Practical steps to take now New rules on humanitarian protection status will apply to claims made on or after 28 June 2022. The changes are another example of how the government’s New Plan for Immigration is creating a crueller, less efficient and more costly asylum system. Around 1,000 people a year are granted humanitarian protection. The Immigration Rules say that it is available to asylum seekers where, among other things, “substantial grounds have been shown for believing that the person concerned, if returned to the country of origin, would face a real risk of suffering serious harm and is unable, or, owing to such risk, u...
Whether income is “lawfully derived” to be assessed case by case, Upper Tribunal holds+
IMMIGRATION

Whether income is “lawfully derived” to be assessed case by case, Upper Tribunal holds+

In a refreshing example of the Upper Tribunal choosing not to lay down wide-ranging obiter guidance on limited facts having not heard relevant submissions, the headnote for Fatima (paragraph 1 (d) Appendix FM-SE: interpretation) [2022] UKUT 155 (IAC) says simply: Interpretation of the phrase “lawfully derived” in paragraph 1 (d) of Appendix FM-SE is to be on a case-to-case basis. The drafter of the Rule did not see fit to provide a definition, and it would not be appropriate for the Tribunal to do so. The sponsor in this case had worked for an employer who had, unbeknownst to the sponsor, failed to make national insurance and tax contributions. This did not stop the income being lawfully derived, as “his income arose perfectly lawfully fro...
Judge takes “points based system” a bit too literally
IMMIGRATION, United Kingdom

Judge takes “points based system” a bit too literally

The headnote from KB (Art 8: points-based proportionality assessment) Albania [2022] UKUT 161 (IAC): Although judges in the immigration jurisdiction should adopt the “balance sheet” approach to ECHR article 8 proportionality assessments, they must not ascribe points to factors weighing on either side of the balance. The judge in this case had assigned points out of 10 to each of the factors weighing for and against the removal of KB to Albania. With all the government’s talk of points based systems one can perhaps understand why a judge might have gone down this road. But it’s not actually a very good way of deciding cases. The Upper Tribunal decision is worth reading for the elucidation and endorsement of the correct “balance sheet” approach. And for the finding in...
Home Office policy on no recourse to public funds found unlawful, again
IMMIGRATION, United Kingdom

Home Office policy on no recourse to public funds found unlawful, again

The High Court has declared that Home Office policy on allowing migrants to have access to public funds is unlawful for failing to take account of the best interests of children, or of a previous judgment along similar lines. The case is R (AB & ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1524 (Admin).  Background It is almost a decade since the introduction of the ten-year route to settlement for people granted permission to stay in the UK on the basis of their family or private life, and the application of the no recourse to public funds (NRPF) restriction to grants of permission on the ten-year route. Since then, there have been numerous challenges to the no-benefits policy. It was most recently held to be unlawful i...
An immigration lawyer reviews Paddington
IMMIGRATION, United Kingdom

An immigration lawyer reviews Paddington

In tribute to beloved author Michael Bond (1926-2017), who died yesterday, I am republishing this blog post reviewing the film Paddington, based on the character created by Bond. The blog post was originally published on 1 December 2014 and versions of it appeared in the New Statesman and Financial Times. Law is pretty abstract. Unlike the role of a doctor or a builder, that of a lawyer is difficult to explain to a young mind. When my children eventually ask me about what I do when I “work” (confusingly simultaneously a place I seem to go to and a thing I do at home; either takes me away from them) my plan is to explain that I help strangers from far off places find new homes. Like Paddington Bear. I never knew the Michael Bond books as a child but...